Thirteen Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers
August 19, 2024 —
Payne & Fears LLPCongratulations to the 13 Payne & Fears attorneys included in the 2025 Edition of “Lawyer of the Year,” The Best Lawyers In America®, and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®. Attorneys have been recognized in the following practice areas:
2025 Edition “Lawyer of the Year”
Orange County
Benjamin A. Nix
Daniel F. Fears
- Litigation – Labor and Employment
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Payne & Fears LLP
Supreme Court Eliminates Judicial 'Chevron' Deference to Federal Agency Statutory Interpretations
July 31, 2024 —
Jane C. Luxton - Lewis BrisboisWashington, D.C. (July 1, 2024) – In a much-anticipated decision, on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a sweeping opinion “overrul[ing]” a 40-year old precedent that required judges to defer to federal agency interpretations of their governing statutes when those laws were ambiguous or silent. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, et al. No. 22-451 (2024), overruling Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).
The decision means that courts will no longer give special weight to an agency’s view of the scope of its regulatory powers but must apply independent judgment in deciding “whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.” Loper Bright, slip op. at 35. Taking pains to explain that the new ruling would not allow for reversals of cases previously decided under the Chevron doctrine, the Court left no doubt that, in the words of Justice Neil Gorsuch, “[t]oday, the Court places a tombstone on Chevron no one can miss.” Id., Gorsuch Concurring Opinion at 1.
Writing for a 6-2 majority, Chief Justice Roberts forcefully condemned the Chevron-based principle that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of the scope of its legal authority, rejecting the concept that agencies have any special expertise in statutory interpretation, a field reserved to the courts, not the executive branch, under Article III of the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Jane C. Luxton, Lewis BrisboisMs. Luxton may be contacted at
Jane.Luxton@lewisbrisbois.com
Preserving Lien Rights on Private Projects in Washington: Three Common Mistakes to Avoid
September 16, 2024 —
Kristina Southwell - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCThe Washington Construction Lien Statute, RCW 60.04 et seq., exists to help secure payment for work performed for the improvement of real property.[
1] The statute grants “any person furnishing labor, professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of real property” the authority to claim “a lien upon the improvement for the contract price of labor, professional services, materials, or equipment furnished.” RCW 60.04.021.
Exercising lien rights is one of the most useful tools available to a contractor or supplier trying to recover payment owed on a project. A properly recorded lien binds the project property, which is typically the most valuable asset held by the owner, as security for the amounts owed to the lien claimant. Additionally, the lien statute provides a basis for the claimant to recover the costs of recording the lien and its attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in litigating the foreclosure of the lien.
While the lien statute authorizes the right to lien, it also provides a series of strict requirements and procedures that a claimant must follow to properly exercise its rights. The claimant must carefully comply with all statutory requirements. This article does not endeavor to explain all the intricacies of the lien statute, but rather discusses three of the most common mistakes that result in the loss of lien rights.
See our lien and bond claim manual for a more detailed guide to construction liens in Washington.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kristina Southwell, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMs. Southwell may be contacted at
kristina.southwell@acslawyers.com
Newport Beach Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real Prevailed on a Demurrer in a Highly Publicized Shooting Case!
November 11, 2024 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPBremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara’s Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real prevailed on a Demurrer in a highly publicized shooting case.
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging negligence, negligent hiring, supervision and retention, and public nuisance against BWB&O’s clients, a highly recognized hospitality and lifestyle company with nightlife and restaurant venues, in addition to other celebrity defendants. Plaintiffs were the victims of a shooting that occurred by an unknown individual(s) outside and near the restaurant/venue owned by BWB&O’s clients.
Plaintiffs alleged it was BWB&O’s clients that were responsible for the third parties’ criminal acts because BWB&O’s clients attracted more people than the venue’s capacity, causing people to occupy the street, sidewalk, and property nearby. Plaintiffs further alleged that BWB&O’s client should have anticipated or known that criminal conduct, including gun violence, would take place.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Employees in Construction Industry Entitled to Compensation for Time Spent Complying with Employer-Mandated Security Protocols
August 19, 2024 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogWage and hour laws dictating how employers must compensate their employees for time worked can, given the innumerable ways that employees perform their jobs, raise a number of questions. The next case, Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, 15 Cal.5th 908 (2024) – which I won’t spend a lot of time discussing since I think it applies in somewhat limited situations – addresses whether employees are entitled to be paid while waiting to enter and exit worksites and for meal periods when they are not allowed to exit a worksite.
The Huerta Case
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals requested that the California Supreme Court address three questions related to whether employees should be compensated under California wage and hour laws for time spent waiting to enter and exit worksites and for meal periods when they are not allowed to exit a worksite:
- Whether employees should be paid for time spent waiting in a personal vehicle to be scanned in and out of a worksite;
- Whether employees should be paid for time spent traveling in a personal vehicle from a security gate to employee parking lots; and
- Whether employees should be paid during meal periods if they are not permitted to leave a worksite.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/23/24) – Construction Backlog Rebounds, Real Estate Sustainability Grows, and Split Incentive Gap Remains Building Decarbonizing Barrier
November 18, 2024 —
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogIn our latest roundup, construction output decreased, office utilization unchanged, September apartment starts fell 15% from a year ago as developers pulled permits, and more!
- Developers pulled permits for a seasonally adjusted rate of 398,000 apartments in buildings with five units or more, a 17.4% YOY drop and a 10.8% decrease compared to August 2024. (Leslie Shaver, Multifamily Dive)
- Construction input prices decreased 0.9% in September due to dips in two of three energy subcategories, reflecting the trend of overall material price stabilization over the past 12 months. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
- Thanks in part to the Federal Reserve’s lowering of the interest rate, construction backlog rebounded in September after slumping at the end of the summer. (Joe Bousquin, Construction Dive)
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team
Construction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”
August 12, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyThe U.S. DOL found itself on June 24 on the wrong end of a preliminary injunction concerning recent changes to the Davis-Bacon Act.
The lawsuit, initiated in Texas federal court by the Associated General Contractors of America and other concerned citizens, sought a preliminary injunction barring implementation and enforcement of “specified portions of § 5.2 and § 5.5(e) of the DOL’s ‘Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations’” – the “Final Rule,” published August 23, 2023.
After determining the appropriateness of the “standing” of the plaintiffs based upon the plaintiffs being “adversely affected” by the Final Rule, the federal court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the Final Rule. In noting its disagreement with the Final Rule, the court stated:
“… the Final Rule amends the DBA [the Davis-Bacon Act] by imposing a stealth selfimplementing DBA requirement in the contract by an operation-of-law provision that contradicts the express statutory language of the Act [the court bristling at the idea that contracts might exclude with impunity the otherwise mandated DBA clauses]. Further, the Final Rule amends the Act to extend the DBA to apply to workers who are not mechanics and laborers, and to extend the scope of the work covered by DBA to include work is not performed ‘directly on the site of the work.’
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Choice of Law Provisions in Construction Contracts
October 07, 2024 —
Victoria Davies - ConsensusDocsIf you have used a ConsensusDocs® construction agreement or another industry association construction agreement for one of your projects, you are accustomed to seeing the laws of the state where the construction project is located as the governing law. There are good reasons for the laws of the state where the project is located to govern the construction agreement for the project. Even if not headquartered in the state, the parties have a presence there by virtue of their participation in the project in the state. Personnel and records that may be needed to resolve a claim may be located in the state. If there are experts that need to be engaged, they will likely need to visit the site. These reasons of efficiency and convenience, alone, may justify the parties’ decision to select the project state’s laws to govern their construction contract. However, there is also the policy interest of the project state, whose laws may even mandate that the project state’s laws govern construction contracts for in-state projects and that the parties resolve their disputes in state as well.
Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by DiversifyingMunicipal Ordinances Create Additional Opportunities for the Defense of Construction Defect Claims in ColoradoCalifornia Supreme Court Finds Vertical Exhaustion Applies to First-Level Excess PoliciesIt’s All a Matter of [Statutory] Construction: Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets the Good Faith Dispute Exception to Prompt Payment Requirements in United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.HHMR is pleased to announce that David McLain has been selected as a 2020 Super LawyerConstruction Employers Beware: New, Easier Union Representation Process Federal Judge Vacates CDC Eviction Moratorium NationwideConstruction Feb. Jobs Jump by 61,000, Jobless Rate Up from Jan.Court Denies Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Collapse ClaimSubcontractors Have Remedies, Even if “Pay-if-Paid” Provisions are EnforcedDoes the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?Home Builders Wear Many HatsWho's Who Legal Recognizes Two White and Williams Lawyers as Thought/Global Leaders in Insurance and ReinsuranceUtah Digs Deep and Finds “Design Defect” Includes Pre-Construction Geotechnical ReportsIs Construction Defect Litigation a Cause for Lack of Condos in Minneapolis?OSHA/VOSH RoundupPrimer Debuts on Life-Cycle Assessments of Embodied Carbon in BuildingsBalcony Collapses Killing Six PeopleBreaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. VanderbiltIn All Fairness: Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Arbitration Clause in a Residential Construction Contract Was Unconscionable and UnenforceableFaulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar CoverageHealth Officials Concerned About Lead-Tainted Dust Created by Detroit Home DemolitionsBerlin Lawmakers Get a New Green WorkspaceStructural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro JobTraub Lieberman Partners Ryan Jones and Scot Samis Obtain Affirmation of Final Summary JudgmentA Behind-the-Scenes Look at Substitution Hearings Under California’s Listing Law Slump in U.S. Housing Starts Led by Multifamily: EconomyResearch Project Underway to Prepare Water Utilities for Wildfire EventsEditorial: Qatar Is Champion of Safety Hypocrisy in Migrant Worker DeathsThree-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court HoldsA Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center AccidentArchitectural Democracy – Interview with Pedro Aibéo#10 CDJ Topic: Carithers v. Mid-Continent Casualty CompanyConstruction Laborers Sue Contractors Over Wage TheftRepairs Could Destroy Evidence in Construction Defect Suit‘I’m a Scapegoat,’ Says Former CEO of Dubai Construction FirmForum Selection Provisions Are Not to Be Overlooked…Even On Federal ProjectsEconomic Waste Doctrine and Construction Defects / Nonconforming WorkAt Long Last, the Colorado Legislature Gets Serious About Construction Defect Reform – In a Constructive WayU.S. Tornadoes, Hail Cost Insurers $1 Billion in JuneLast Parcel of Rancho del Oro Masterplan Purchased by Cornerstone CommuntiesFifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" ExclusionReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/23/23) – Distressed Prices, Carbon Removal and Climate Change“I Didn’t Sign That!” – Applicability of Waivers of Subrogation to Non-Signatory Third PartiesProperly Trigger the Performance BondLorelie S. Masters Nominated for Best in Insurance & Reinsurance for the Women in Business Law Awards 2021Over a Hundred Thousand Superstorm Sandy Cases Re-OpenedEngineer at Flint Negligence Trial Details Government Water ErrorsThe Condominium Warranty Against Structural Defects in the District of ColumbiaCreative Avenue for Judgment Creditor to Collect a JudgmentDespite Increased Presence in Construction, Women Lack Size-Appropriate PPEFlorida Supreme Court Decision Limits Special Damages Presented to JuriesNew York Considering Legislation That Would Create Statute of Repose For ConstructionOhio School Board and Contractor Meet to Discuss Alleged DefectsIdaho Construction Executive Found Guilty of Fraud and Tax EvasionAlleged Serious Defects at Hanford Nuclear Waste Treatment Plant 
