How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites
April 08, 2026 —
Michael Bruns - Construction ExecutiveTraditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact.
Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management.
Reprinted courtesy of
Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations
January 13, 2026 —
Michael S. McDonough, Ashleigh Myers & Karen Eskander - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogOn December 9, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) issued
proposed regulations and a
staff report for California’s comprehensive climate disclosure laws, the
Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the
Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261). These proposed regulations come less than a month after the
Ninth Circuit issued an injunction temporarily halting enforcement of SB 261, at least until a January 9, 2026, hearing on the plaintiffs’ requested longer-term injunction through the remainder of the First Amendment challenge to the laws. The draft regulations would adopt some, but not all, of the provisions proposed by CARB in its public workshops on the laws to date, and notably would scale back applicability to those companies above a threshold level of sales in the state. The proposed regulations also define key terms, establish the program fee structures, explain fee enforcement and set initial reporting timelines. The written comment period begins on December 26, 2025, and ends on February 9, 2026. CARB will hold a
public hearing on the proposed regulations on February 26, 2026 at 9 a.m. PST.
Reprinted courtesy of
Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury,
Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury and
Karen Eskander, Pillsbury
Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Eskander may be contacted at karen.eskander@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
On Checks and Balances
March 03, 2026 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogIt’s called “checks and balances” for a reason. And, generally, it works well so long as there are clear boundaries between the “co-equal” branches of government.
In
Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 108 Cal.App.5th 243 (2025), the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld a set of regulations issued by the California Apprenticeship Council that contradicted an earlier 2015 ruling of the Court of Appeals.
The Associated General Contractors of California Case
At issue in the case was California’s Prevailing Wage Law which requires public works contractors to hire a certain ratio of apprentices. The purpose of the apprenticeship requirements is to maintain the pipeline of skilled tradespeople on taxpayer-funded projects.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Toolbox Talk Series: GenAI Document Review
January 06, 2026 —
Brendan J. Witry - The Dispute ResolverThis month's installment of the Toolbox Talk Series explored the use of Generative AI in document review, which as construction lawyers know can be voluminous. Jack Bandlow and Travis Olson from BRG provided an overview of how lawyers can use GenAI to make document review in construction litigation more efficient.
Like other uses of GenAI, it is a tool that is not designed to replace lawyers. Rather it helps eliminate or reduce mundane or tedious tasks that are not the highest and best use of a lawyer's time. The AI-powered document review platforms are designed to recognize patterns in documents and transforms words and text into "vectors" to group concepts with similar meanings. For example, whereas a traditional keyword search for "weather delay" will only return hits on that keyword, a search utilizing vectoring will also search for conceptually similar terms, even if the keyword does not match. These tools can use natural language searches to return results that a responsive to the prompt.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brendan J. Witry, Laurie & Brennan LLPMr. Witry may be contacted at
bwitry@lauriebrennan.com
Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest
February 02, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWhen it comes to contracts, there may be a clause that provides that untimely payments shall bear interest at a particular rate. Or it may be the statutory rate. That clause will come into play when determining prejudgment interest. In ANY dispute, prejudgment interest can be an important damages component that accrues from the date of the loss. Don’t ignore prejudgment interest.
The Fourth District of Florida, in a construction dispute, maintained:
“[I]f a plaintiff establishes that he sustained out-of-pocket loss, prejudgment interest must be awarded from the date of the loss. The trial court has no discretion regarding awarding prejudgment interest and must do so applying the statutory rate of interest in effect at the time the interest accrues.”
Bensusan v. Design Engineering Group, LLC, 2025 WL 3466367 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (citation omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI
March 03, 2026 —
Christopher J. Olsen, Freddy X. Muñoz & Gary M. Stein - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery.
Facts
Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com
Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com
Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Government Claiming Contract Is Void Ab Initio by Contractor Knowingly Making False Statements
January 06, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesCan the federal government declare a contract “void ab initio” or void from the beginning? Yes, if the government can “prove that the contractor (a) obtained the contract by (b) knowingly (c) making a false statement.” MLB Transportation v. U.S., 2025 WL 2962897, *8 (Fed.Cl. 2025) (citation omitted).
Where a contractor “obtained [a] contract by knowingly falsely stating that it was a small business … [the] government contract [is] tainted from its inception by fraud [and] is void ab initio.” The general rule that “a Government contract tainted by fraud or wrong-doing is void ab initio … protects the integrity of the federal contracting process and safeguards the public from undetectable threats to the public fisc.” A contract found to be void ab initio has “no legal effect,” and is “[n]ull from the beginning, as from the first moment when a contract is entered into.”
MLB Transportation, supra (citations omitted).
Sweat the Small Stuff – Don’t Overlook These Three (3) Clauses When Negotiating Your Construction ContractBHA at The Basic Course in Texas Construction LawConstruction Industry Groups Challenge DOL’s New DBRA RegulationsDefinitions Matter in Illinois: Tenant Held Liable Only for Damage to Apartment UnitGovernor Bob Ferguson’s Recent Executive Orders – A Positive Sign for Washington’s Construction IndustryA Tuesday With Lisa ColonContractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the DifferenceA Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t MixWhen a Construction Lender Steps into the Shoes of the Developer, the Door is Open for Claims by the General ContractorThe Investors Profiting Off Water ScarcityGoogle’s Biggest Moonshot Is Its Search for a Carbon-Free FutureToward Increased Citizen Engagement in Urban PlanningDrones, Googleplexes and HyperloopsCoverage for Injury to Insured’s Employee Not CoveredAppraisers’ Failure to Perform Assessment of Property’s Existence or Damage is Reversible ErrorAugust Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Appreciate at Faster PaceBest Lawyers® Recognizes 37 White And Williams LawyersNo Bad Faith In Filing InterpleaderAre You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With TransparencyADP Says Payrolls at Companies in U.S. Increase 200,000Seattle’s Audacious Aquarium Throws Builders Swerves, Curves, Twists and TurnsContractor Sues Yelp Reviewer for DefamationA Trivial CaseThe Risks and Rewards of Sustainable Building DesignContractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case DismissedAttorneys’ Fees Are Available in Arizona Eviction ActionsIndemnity Clauses—What do they mean, and what should you be looking for?Reminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t EnoughInsured Survives Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse CaseJury Convicts Ciminelli, State Official in Bid-Rig CaseReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/18/23) – Construction Inventory, 3D Printing, and Metaverse ReplicasNew Jersey Appellate Court Reinstates Asbestos ActionCalifornia’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction ContractsHamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set RecordLike Water For Chocolate: Insurer Prevails Over Chocolatier In Hurricane Sandy ClaimGeorgia Amends Anti-Indemnity StatutePartner Patrick Au Achieves a Major Arbitration Result on a Redevelopment Project in Downtown Los Angeles!California Supreme Court Finds Negligent Supervision Claim Alleges An OccurrenceNo Coverage for Additional Insured After Completion of OperationsSchool’s Lawsuit over Defective Field Construction DelayedFocusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup StadiumsFlorida Lawmakers Fail to Reach Agreement on Condominium Safety BillConstruction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3Update: Amazon Can (Still) Be Liable in LouisianaThe Hidden Price of Outdated Damage Prevention Laws: Part ICDJ’s #3 Topic of the Year: Burch v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (2014)General Contractor Gets Fired [Upon] for Subcontractor’s Failure to Hire ApprenticesHere's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your HomeCommonwealth Court Strikes Blow to Philly Window and Door OrdinanceConn. Appellate Court Overturns Jury Verdict, Holding Plaintiff’s Sole Remedy for Injuries Arising From Open Manhole Was State’s Highway Defect Statuten for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion
Hurricane Ian: Discussing Wind-Water DisputesPlaza Construction Negotiating Pay Settlement for Florida Ritz-Carlton RenovationConsider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory ClausePresident Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Requires a Viable Statutory Framework (PPP Statutes)[i]Miller Act Bond Claims Subject to “Pay If Paid”. . . SometimesSpeeding up Infrastructure Projects with the Cloud#4 CDJ Topic: Vita Planning and Landscape Architecture, Inc. v. HKS Architects, Inc.With Trump's Tariff Talk, Time to Negotiate for Escalation Clauses in Construction ContractsWalkability Increases Real Estate ValuesThe Final Frontier Opens Up New Business Opportunities for Private ContractorsColorado Senate Committee Approves Construction Defect BillSafety, Technology Combine to Change the Construction ConversationNorfolk Southern Accused of Trying to Destroy Evidence of Ohio WreckConstruction Litigation Roundup: “Apparently, It’s Not Always Who You Know”Happy Thanksgiving from CDJNo Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Based Upon Exclusion for Contractual Assumption of LiabilityBWBO Celebrating Attorney Award and Two New PartnersFranchisors Should Consider Signing a Conditional Lease Assignment Rather Than a Franchisee’s Lease 
