• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida high-rise construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida multi family housing expert witness Zephyrhills Florida industrial building expert witness Zephyrhills Florida townhome construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida condominiums expert witness Zephyrhills Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida production housing expert witness Zephyrhills Florida condominium expert witness Zephyrhills Florida institutional building expert witness Zephyrhills Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Zephyrhills Florida custom home expert witness Zephyrhills Florida parking structure expert witness Zephyrhills Florida low-income housing expert witness Zephyrhills Florida Medical building expert witness Zephyrhills Florida tract home expert witness Zephyrhills Florida casino resort expert witness Zephyrhills Florida retail construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida office building expert witness Zephyrhills Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Zephyrhills Florida custom homes expert witness Zephyrhills Florida landscaping construction expert witness Zephyrhills Florida
    Zephyrhills Florida construction project management expert witnessZephyrhills Florida building code expert witnessZephyrhills Florida expert witness windowsZephyrhills Florida expert witness roofingZephyrhills Florida expert witness commercial buildingsZephyrhills Florida structural engineering expert witnessesZephyrhills Florida civil engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Zephyrhills, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Zephyrhills Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & CA of Brevard
    Local # 1012
    1500 W Eau Gallie Blvd Ste A
    Melbourne, FL 32935

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Polk County Builders Association
    Local # 1028
    2232 Heritage Dr
    Lakeland, FL 33801

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Hernando Bldrs Assoc
    Local # 1010
    7391 Sunshine Grove Rd
    Brooksville, FL 34613

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Tampa Bay Builders Association
    Local # 1036
    11242 Winthrop Main St
    Riverview, FL 33578

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando
    Local # 1040
    544 Mayo Ave
    Maitland, FL 32751

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Lake County
    Local # 1026
    1100 N Joanna Ave
    Tavares, FL 32778

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Citrus Cty Bldr Assn
    Local # 1006
    1196 S Lecanto Hwy
    Lecanto, FL 34461

    Zephyrhills Florida Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Zephyrhills Florida

    The Biggest Change to the Mechanics Lien Law Since 1963

    Flying Solo: How it Helps My Construction Clients

    2018 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction Industry

    Pennsylvania: Searching Questions Ahead of Oral Argument in Domtar

    California Supreme Court Holds “Notice-Prejudice” Rule is “Fundamental Public Policy” of California, May Override Choice of Law Provisions in Policies

    Read Carefully. The Insurance Coverage You Thought You Were Getting May Not Be The Coverage You Got

    Coverage Found For Cleanup of Superfund Site Despite Pollution Exclusion

    Brenner Base Tunnelers Conquer Peaks and Valleys in the Alps

    Colorado Hotel Neighbors Sue over Construction Plans

    Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case Triggered by Complaint's Allegations

    Recent Bribery and Anti-Corruption Enforcement Trends in Global Construction Industry

    New Jersey Courts Sign "Death Knell" for 1979 Weedo Decision

    Insurer Sued for Altering Policies after Claim

    Owners and Contractors Beware: Pennsylvania (Significantly) Strengthens Contractor Payment Act

    Builders FirstSource to Buy ProBuild for $1.63 Billion

    Nevada Provides Independant Counsel When Conflict Arises Between Insurer and Insured

    Dallas Condo Project to Expand

    New York City Council’s Carbon Emissions Regulation Opposed by Real Estate Board

    Disaster Remediation Contracts: Understanding the Law to Avoid a Second Disaster

    NY Is Set To Sue US EPA Over ‘Completion’ of PCB Removal

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    Assignment Endorsement Requiring Consent of All Insureds, Additional Insureds and Mortgagees Struck Down in Florida

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    The Nightmare Scenario for Florida’s Coastal Homeowners

    California Subcontractor Gets a Kick in the Rear (or Perhaps the Front) for Prematurely Recorded Mechanics Lien

    Utah’s Highest Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Properly Commence an Action to Rely on the Relation-Back Doctrine to Overcome the Statute of Repose

    Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal Suggests Negligent Repairs to Real Property Are Not Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Double-Wide World Cup Seats Available to 6-Foot, 221-Pound Fans

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Area Variance Standard; Property Owners May Obtain an Area Variance When Special Circumstances Existed at Purchase

    Duty to Defend Affirmed in Connecticut Construction Defect Case

    The Brexit Effect on the Construction Industry

    South Africa Wants Payment From Colluding World Cup Builders

    Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Number

    New Defendant Added to Morrison Bridge Decking Lawsuit

    New Jersey Appellate Court Reinstates Asbestos Action

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    Ninth Circuit Rules Supreme Court’s Two-Part Test of Implied Certification under the False Claims Act Mandatory

    Testing Your Nail Knowledge

    Court Calls Lease-Leaseback Project What it is: A Design-Bid-Build Project

    Wendel Rosen Construction Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Concludes “Soup to Nuts” Policy Does Not Include Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    Georgia Passes Solar CUVA Bill

    New Jersey’s Proposed Construction Defect Law May Not Cover Everything

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    NYPD Investigating Two White Flags on Brooklyn Bridge

    Industry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Lenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered Conditions

    AB 1701 – General Contractor Liability for Subcontractors’ Unpaid Wages
    Corporate Profile


    The Zephyrhills, Florida Expert Witness Engineer Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Zephyrhills' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Zephyrhills, Florida

    Sweet News for Yum Yum Donuts: Lost Goodwill is Not an All or Nothing Proposition

    October 07, 2019 —
    Last month a California Court of Appeals clarified that a property owner facing eminent domain is only required to prove partial loss of goodwill, not total loss of goodwill, to be entitled to a trial on the amount of goodwill lost. Yum Yum Donuts operated a shop in Los Angeles that was subject to eminent domain by the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to make way for light railway track. At trial, Yum Yum sought loss of goodwill as part of its condemnation damages under Code of Civil Procedure section 1263.510. At trial the MTA’s expert testified that Yum Yum could have reduced its goodwill loss if it relocated to one of three alternative locations rather than simply closing the shop. But the expert conceded that even if Yum Yum had relocated, it would have lost some goodwill. Yum Yum refused to relocate, arguing that its relocation costs would render the move unprofitable. The trial court found that Yum Yum’s failure to mitigate its damages barred Yum Yum from having a jury trial to recover any goodwill damages. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Josh Cohen, Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Cohen may be contacted at

    San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

    January 06, 2020 —
    Each night, a prancing robotic dog roves the site of Terminal 1 at San Francisco International Airport (SFO), taking photographs of construction on the new terminal, which replaces a 1960s-era building with nearly 900,000 sq ft of state-of-the-art space. The $2.6-billion Harvey Milk terminal is the highlight of a $7.2-billion capital plan. “We are about halfway through,” says Geoff Neumayr, chief development officer for SFO. The program includes a 3,600-space parking garage, a consolidated office campus, a new hotel, a waste treatment plant, improvements to Terminal 2 and the international terminal, and a new on-airport train station. This summer the first nine gates opened at Terminal 1, with nine more slated to open next year and a completion date of 2023 with 25 total gates, including two that will accommodate Airbus A380s double-decker planes. Aileen Cho, Engineering News-Record Ms. Cho may be contacted at Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Recent Bribery and Anti-Corruption Enforcement Trends in Global Construction Industry

    August 26, 2019 —
    Bribery and corruption have long plagued the construction industry, particularly in the developing world and emerging markets. Large contracts often trickle down through layers of subcontractors, presenting opportunities for corruption at each level. The risk is enhanced in certain foreign jurisdictions, where large corporations may be wholly or partially state-owned enterprises and public officials may expect payment in exchange for state-issued licenses or government contracts. Recent enforcement trends indicate that both the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are increasingly targeting the construction industry for anti-bribery and corruption actions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Several former DOJ officials also recently commented that the construction industry has become a focus of anti-corruption enforcement efforts. The FCPA is a formidable tool for regulators, making it unlawful to influence a foreign government official with any type of payment or personal reward. While certain safe harbors apply — including de minimis payments made to expedite routine governmental action or the payment being lawful in the foreign jurisdiction — these exceptions are construed narrowly and can be difficult to apply in practice. Reprinted courtesy of Ralph A. Finizio, Pepper Hamilton LLP and Anthony Finizio, Pepper Hamilton LLP Mr. Finizio may be contacted at Mr. Finizio may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Good-To-Know Points Regarding (I) Miller Act Payment Bonds And (Ii) Payment Bond Surety Compelling Arbitration

    December 22, 2019 —
    Every now and then I come across an opinion that addresses good-to-know legal issues as a corollary of strategic litigation decisions that are questionable and/or creative. An opinion out of the United States District Court of New Mexico, Rock Roofing, LLC v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, 2019 WL 4418918 (D. New Mexico 2019), is such an opinion. In Rock Roofing, an owner hired a contractor to construct apartments. The contractor furnished a payment bond. The contractor, in the performance of its work, hired a roofing subcontractor. A dispute arose under the subcontract and the roofer recorded a construction lien against the project. The contractor, per New Mexico law, obtained a bond to release the roofer’s construction lien from the project (real property). The roofer then filed a lawsuit in federal court against the payment bond surety claiming it is entitled to: (1) collect on the contractor’s Miller Act payment bond (?!?) and (2) foreclose its construction lien against the lien release bond furnished per New Mexico law. Count I – Miller Act Payment Bond Claiming the payment bond issued by the contractor is a Miller Act payment bond is a head scratcher. This claim was dismissed with prejudice upon the surety’s motion to dismiss. This was an easy call. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Associate Cary D. Steklof Selected to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite Up & Comers List for 2019

    September 09, 2019 —
    Hunton Andrews Kurth’s insurance coverage practice is proud to congratulate Cary D. Steklof for being selected by his peers to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite Up & Comers list for 2019. A total of 131 attorneys under the age of 40 throughout the state of Florida were recognized for their leadership in the law and their communities. Cary was one of only seven attorneys selected for their skill and counsel in the area of insurance. We congratulate Cary and all of the recipients of this award who have distinguished themselves for their superior advocacy, knowledge, and accomplishments as young professionals. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at

    Randy Maniloff Recognized by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® as a "Lawyer of the Year"

    October 14, 2019 —
    Congratulations to Randy Maniloff, Counsel in the Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Group, who was named the U.S. News – Best Lawyers® 2020 Insurance Law “Lawyer of the Year” in Philadelphia. Randy was recognized by his peers for his professional abilities in this area. "Lawyer of the Year" recognitions are awarded to individual lawyers with extremely high overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic location. Randy concentrates his practice in the representation of insurers in coverage disputes over primary and excess obligations under a host of policies, including general liability and various professional liability policies. He has significant experience in coverage matters involving additional insured and contractual indemnity issues. His practice also includes an academic side. He is an adjunct professor of Insurance at Temple University Beasley School of Law and the co-author of “General Liability Insurance Coverage – Key Issues in Every State” (4th edition), a nearly 1,000 page reference book that provides 50-state surveys on 20 critical liability coverage issues. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Randy Maniloff, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Maniloff may be contacted at

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    August 06, 2019 —
    Project closeout is sometimes one of the last things on a contractor’s mind at the beginning of a project, but project closeout can have a huge impact on a contractor’s overall profitability and success. Effectively managing the closeout process is critical, and it all begins with the negotiation and execution of the project contract. This contract can, and should, provide a complete roadmap for project closeout, as addressing these issues on the front end can set up the parties for successful project completion. It is then equally important to re-review the terms of the contract as project closeout approaches to ensure that everyone, including the owner, adheres to all contractual requirements. This article examines several pertinent issues related to project closeout that should be addressed during the contracting stage, including defining substantial and final completion, inspection and acceptance, punch lists, and warranties. Defining Substantial and Final Completion Having clear definitions for both substantial and final completion in your construction contract is an important and necessary early step in achieving successful project closeout. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William E. Underwood, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Underwood may be contacted at

    Failing to Adopt a Comprehensive Cyber Plan Can Lead to Disaster

    January 13, 2020 —
    Despite being aware of cyber risk, and even frightened by it, a shocking number of companies in the construction industry have neither a cyber insurance policy nor a basic cyber security plan to deal with a hack or breach into their computer systems. Once breached, companies with no plan in place become, essentially, a rudderless ship subject to the whims of criminal tides. A proper cyber plan lays out at least the following:
    • the criteria for when a plan would be triggered (i.e., in the event of a breach or a hack);
    • which persons inside the company (in-house counsel, IT personnel, executive, project managers) and which persons outside the company (attorney with knowledge of cyber issues and ideally construction law as well; forensic computer experts, crisis management experts; and an insurance broker familiar with cyber policies) should be involved;
    • the chain of command and communication in this type of situation and the distinct roles each of the above players will fulfill (Note: this is not the same as the normal corporate chain of command); and
    • the various available options to address the breach situation, which will all depend upon the facts at issue—such as the type and extent of the breach and how much of what particular kind of information was lost, stolen or exfiltrated.
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Volack, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Mr. Volack may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of