• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Teller Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Teller Alaska casino resort expert witness Teller Alaska custom home expert witness Teller Alaska low-income housing expert witness Teller Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Teller Alaska institutional building expert witness Teller Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Teller Alaska townhome construction expert witness Teller Alaska multi family housing expert witness Teller Alaska condominiums expert witness Teller Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Teller Alaska production housing expert witness Teller Alaska Medical building expert witness Teller Alaska condominium expert witness Teller Alaska custom homes expert witness Teller Alaska industrial building expert witness Teller Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Teller Alaska tract home expert witness Teller Alaska parking structure expert witness Teller Alaska retail construction expert witness Teller Alaska hospital construction expert witness Teller Alaska
    Teller Alaska structural engineering expert witnessesTeller Alaska construction safety expertTeller Alaska roofing and waterproofing expert witnessTeller Alaska contractor expert witnessTeller Alaska forensic architectTeller Alaska slope failure expert witnessTeller Alaska building consultant expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Teller, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Teller Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Teller Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Teller Alaska

    Case Remanded for Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    The Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce Erosion

    Contractor Allegedly Injured after Slipping on Black Ice Files Suit

    Hunton Insurance Recovery Lawyers Ranked by Chambers as Top Insurance Practitioners

    San Diego: Compromise Reached in Fee Increases for Affordable Housing

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    The Construction Industry's Health Kick

    Consider Short-Term Lease Workouts For Commercial Tenants

    Federal Court Finds Occurrence for Faulty Workmanship Under Virginia Law

    Cost of Materials Holding Back Housing Industry

    Housing Starts Surge 23% in Comeback for Canadian Builders

    California Supreme Court McMillin Ruling

    Empire State Building Owners Sue Photographer for Topless Photo Shoot

    Corvette museum likely to keep part of sinkhole

    Aurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect Ordinance

    The "Dark Overlord" Strikes The Practice Of Law: What Law Firms Can Do To Protect Themselves

    First Look at Long List of AEC Firms Receiving PPP Loans

    Traub Lieberman Elects New Partners for 2020

    Builders Arrested after Building Collapses in India

    24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time Highs

    Delaware Strengthens Jurisdictional Defenses for Foreign Corporations Registered to Do Business in Delaware

    When Your “Private” Project Suddenly Turns into a “Public” Project. Hint: It Doesn’t Necessary Turn on Public Financing or Construction

    When is a “Notice of Completion” on a California Private Works Construction Project Valid? Why Does It Matter for My Collection Rights?

    Shifting Fees and Costs in Nevada Construction Defect Cases

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Insurance Agent Sued for Lapse in Coverage after House Collapses

    The Death of Retail and Legal Issues

    A Word to the Wise about Construction Defects

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    Wood Product Rotting in New Energy Efficient Homes

    General Contractors Can Be Sued by a Subcontractor’s Injured Employee

    Stadium Intended for the 2010 World Cup Still Not Ready

    Construction and Contract Issues Blamed for Problems at Anchorage Port

    Broker's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence Claim Denied

    Don’t Miss the 2015 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Prospective Additional Insureds May Be Obligated to Arbitrate Coverage Disputes

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development

    CSLB’s Military Application Assistance Program

    Georgia Update: Automatic Renewals in Consumer Service Contracts

    Midview Board of Education Lawsuit Over Construction Defect Repairs

    Delaware Court Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year

    Connecticut District Court to Review Proposed Class Action in Defective Concrete Suit

    Policy's Limitation Period for Seeking Replacement Costs Not Enforced Where Unreasonable

    Indiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing Markings

    Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House

    Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy

    The Four Forces That Will Take on Concrete and Make Construction Smart
    Corporate Profile


    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Teller, Alaska Expert Witness Engineer Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Teller's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Teller, Alaska

    Construction Contracts Need Amending Post COVID-19 Shutdowns

    October 19, 2020 —
    No one could have expected the coronavirus pandemic in the beginning of 2020. True, there were rumblings about a sickness in China that was highly contagious and infecting many people. Death tolls began rising as the world watched in disbelieve. After all, this is 2020. This is not supposed to happen. We should have been able to control the spread of the virus, but we could not. COVID-19 quickly spread throughout the world causing havoc and economic despair. While some sectors of the construction industry are not as impacted as others, contractors industry-wide need to consider how COVID-19 will impact their contractual obligations. Depending on what happens and what the government decides to do to stop the spread of the coronavirus, project delays, supply chain distributions, lost productivity and work stoppages may continue for months. All of this will impact the contracts that contractors have with owners. Contractors may not be able to preform according to the terms of the contract through no fault of their own. Owners may no longer qualify for the financing needed to pay for the project. FORCE MAJEURE According to Investopedia, “force majeure refers to a clause that is included in contracts to remove liability for natural and unavoidable catastrophes that interrupt the expected course of events and prevent participants from fulfilling obligations.” Reprinted courtesy of Richard P. Higgins, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of
    Mr. Higgins may be contacted at

    McCarthy Workers Test Fall-Protection Harnesses Designed to Better Fit Women

    November 09, 2020 —
    At project sites in Dallas, Houston and Atlanta, 27 McCarthy Building Co. women employees are testing a harness better suited to fit a diversity of body types than the more ubiquitous harnesses generally available at construction sites. Reprinted courtesy of Corinne Grinapol, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Alexis Crump Receives 2020 Lawyer Monthly Women in Law Award

    August 31, 2020 —
    Los Angeles Partner Alexis G. Crump has been recognized with a 2020 Lawyer Monthly "Women in Law Award." In receiving this honor, Ms. Crump joins an elite group of women from around the world who have influenced the legal profession with their experience and expertise. Lawyer Monthly’s "Women in Law Awards" emerged as one of the first industry awards to celebrate the achievements and contributions made by women working globally in the legal sector and in business. Recognizing women at all levels of seniority, the publication seeks to acknowledge the challenges that female legal professionals regularly overcome to serve their clients and perform at their best. “It is an honor to be recognized alongside so many outstanding and accomplished women. I look forward to continuing to support my colleagues in their work and participating in the global network of female attorneys,” Ms. Crump said. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexis Crump, Lewis Brisbois
    Ms. Crump may be contacted at

    Partner Vik Nagpal is Recognized as a Top Lawyer of 2020

    June 29, 2020 —
    Please join us in congratulating San Diego Partner Vik Nagpal for being recognized as a Top Lawyer of 2020 by San Diego Magazine! San Diego Magazine works with Martindale-Hubbell to choose top lawyers who have reached the highest level of ethical standards and professional excellence. Vik Nagpal was evaluated and given the highest ratings by the colleagues using a peer reviewed Vik Nagpal is the managing partner of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara LLP’s San Diego offices, as well as directing the firm’s business development. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    New York Court Discusses Evidentiary Standards for Policy Rescission Based on Material Misrepresentation

    August 10, 2020 —
    On July 27, 2020, in the case of Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. AKI Renovations Group, Inc., (Sup. Ct. NY Co. 2020), Index No. 159421/2017 (unpublished), the trial court issued an Order granting summary judgment permitting rescission of a CGL policy based upon material misrepresentations in a policy application. The insured submitted an application in which it failed to disclose its demolition operations despite specific questions seeking this information. Mt. Hawley issued a primary and excess policy for the period of December 29, 2016 to December 29, 2017 (collectively, the policy). Subsequently, the insured sought coverage for a claim in which it was alleged that the insured was acting as a general contractor for demolition of a three-story building when the plaintiff was injured. The insurer advised the defendants that it was rescinding the policy ab initio, and also returned defendants’ premium in its entirety. The insurer asserted that it would not have issued the policy had defendants disclosed their demolition operations, then filed the coverage action seeking a judicial declaration ratifying its rescission of the policy. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert S. Nobel, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Nobel may be contacted at

    Chinese Telecommunications Ban to Expand to Federally Funded Contracts Effective November 12, 2020

    September 21, 2020 —
    In our previous alert, we discussed the Federal Government’s Ban (the “Ban”) on certain Chinese covered telecommunications and video surveillance equipment and services in federal government contracts. The ban prohibits government contractors and subcontractors from supplying to the Federal Government or using in their own internal operations certain telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced by Huawei Technologies Company, ZTE Corporation, Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, and Dahua Technology Company, as well as their subsidiaries and affiliates. The Ban currently applies to companies contracting directly with the Federal Government. Soon, however, the Ban – at least in part – will expand to contractors and subcontractors who are awarded certain federally assisted contracts and subcontracts. On August 13, 2020, the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) published Final Guidance revising its grants and agreements regulations (2 CFR Part 200) to prohibit recipients and subrecipients from using loan or grant funds to purchase or obtain covered telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services. Effective November 12, 2020, recipients and subrecipients are prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
    1. Procure or obtain;
    2. Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or
    3. Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system.
    Reprinted courtesy of Lori Ann Lange, Peckar & Abramson and Sabah Petrov, Peckar & Abramson Ms. Lange may be contacted at Ms. Petrov may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Remote Trials Can Control Prejudgment Risk

    September 07, 2020 —
    While courts across the country are largely unavailable to litigants demanding a jury trial, pre-judgment interest rules present an increasing penalty risk to a defendant wanting its day in court and may not always make a plaintiff whole. The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the manner in which people and industries operate across the board. In light of the need to maintain social distancing whenever possible, the use of technology to replace in-person appearances is becoming more commonplace. As more attorneys become comfortable with the remote platform, the willingness to consider a remote trial grows. With in-person jury trials suspended until further notice, it is important for attorneys and parties to consider the attendant consequences of the indefinite delay in waiting for a traditional jury trial. Aside from general inconvenience, continued delays may have a substantial financial impact, particularly with regard to the accumulation of pre-judgment interest. Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP attorneys Robert G. Devine, Victor J. Zarrilli and Kimberly M. Collins Mr. Devine may be contacted at Mr. Zarrilli may be contacted at Ms. Collins may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    October 26, 2020 —
    The commercial construction contracting and subcontracting industry in general is unique under the law for industry professionals, as they’re typically limited to wage and hour litigation under provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The majority of FLSA cases seek class action status or collective classification, while other FLSA litigation is initiated by individuals seeking damages. For the former, past and current employees can opt into class action litigation and seek collective damages against a construction company. The looming financial burden of class action or collective litigation against construction companies consume time, money and resources to the extent it’s often advisable for Defendants to negotiate an unfair settlement. Yet, thanks to a recent federal court decision on March 27, 2020, the legal maneuvering behind unreasonable Plaintiff demands may soon be counter-balanced by the class action Defendants’ right to due process review. A recent legal opinion in a recent FLSA case has potentially wide-ranging implications for Defendant employers mired in future class action litigation. Moreover, as the FLSA applies to all employers, this decision potentially applies to all ownership groups representing the commercial construction industry, extending to partners, contractors and subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Amber Karns & Dan Pipitone, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Mr. Pipitone may be contacted at Ms. Karns may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of