• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Seattle Washington concrete tilt-up expert witness Seattle Washington landscaping construction expert witness Seattle Washington townhome construction expert witness Seattle Washington high-rise construction expert witness Seattle Washington custom home expert witness Seattle Washington parking structure expert witness Seattle Washington retail construction expert witness Seattle Washington housing expert witness Seattle Washington Medical building expert witness Seattle Washington production housing expert witness Seattle Washington low-income housing expert witness Seattle Washington Subterranean parking expert witness Seattle Washington structural steel construction expert witness Seattle Washington custom homes expert witness Seattle Washington condominiums expert witness Seattle Washington multi family housing expert witness Seattle Washington hospital construction expert witness Seattle Washington office building expert witness Seattle Washington institutional building expert witness Seattle Washington condominium expert witness Seattle Washington tract home expert witness Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington construction claims expert witnessSeattle Washington expert witness structural engineerSeattle Washington building expertSeattle Washington engineering consultantSeattle Washington contractor expert witnessSeattle Washington building code compliance expert witnessSeattle Washington expert witness commercial buildings
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Seattle Washington

    Home-Building Climate Warms in U.S. as Weather Funk Lifts

    DIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty Penalty

    Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied

    Court Again Defines Extent of Contractor’s Insurance Coverage

    New York Nonprofit Starts Anti-Scaffold Law Video Series

    Insurance Law Alert: California Supreme Court Limits Advertising Injury Coverage for Disparagement

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Kushner Cos. Probed Over Harassment of Low-Income Tenants

    Colorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo Developers

    Engineers Found ‘Hundreds’ of Cracks in California Bridge

    Smart Cities Offer New Ideas for Connectivity

    Should CGL Insurer have Duty to Defend Insured During Chapter 558 Notice of Construction Defects Process???

    New Green Standards; Same Green Warnings for Architects & Engineers (law note)

    Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect Covenants

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is not himself bonded? (Bonding Agent Perspective)

    City Potentially Liable for Cost Overrun on Not-to-Exceed Public Works Contract

    Flood Insurance Claim Filed in State Court Properly Dismissed

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    With an Eye Already in the Sky, Crane Camera Goes Big Data

    Obtaining Temporary Injunction to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement

    New York Court Holds Radioactive Materials Exclusion Precludes E&O Coverage for Negligent Phase I Report

    Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien “Waivers” and “Releases”: What’s the Difference?

    Risk Management and Contracting after Hurricane Irma: Suggestions to Avoid a Second Disaster

    Virginia General Assembly Helps Construction Contractors

    California Ballot Initiative Seeks to Repeal Infrastructure Funding Bill

    First-Time Buyers Home Sales Stagnates

    First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years

    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    The Importance of the Subcontractor Exception to the “Your Work” Exclusion

    UCF Sues Architects and Contractors Over Stadium Construction Defects

    Ex-Corps Worker Pleads Guilty to Bribery on Afghan Contract

    Grupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-Up

    Utility Contractor Held Responsible for Damaged Underground Electrical Line

    Rattlesnake Bite Triggers Potential Liability for Walmart

    Property Damage to Non-Defective Work Is Covered

    A Discussion on Home Affordability

    The Project “Completion” Paradox in California

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    Not so Fast! How Does Revoking Acceleration of a Note Impact the Statute of Limitations?

    APROPLAN and GenieBelt Merge, Creating “LetsBuild” – the Build Phase End-to-End Digital Platform

    Loose Bolts Led to Sagging Roof in Construction Defect Claim

    Employee Exclusion Bars Coverage for Wrongful Death of Subcontractor's Employee

    Assembly Bill 1701 Contemplates Broader Duty to Subcontractor’s Employees by General Contractor

    Coverage Established for Property Damage Caused by Added Product

    When is Construction Put to Its “Intended Use”?

    Power of Workers Compensation Immunity on Construction Project

    Team Temporarily Stabilizes Delaware River Bridge Crack
    Corporate Profile


    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Seattle, Washington Expert Witness Engineer Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Seattle's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Tenants Who Negligently Cause Fires in Florida Beware: You May Be Liable to the Landlord’s Insurer

    May 13, 2019 —
    In Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Puccini, LLC, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 1487, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D 383, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals considered whether a landlord’s carrier, Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich), was precluded from pursuing a subrogation claim against the landlord’s tenant, Puccini, LLC (Puccini), for fire-related damages. After the fire, Zurich paid its insured, Lincoln-Drexel Waserstein, Ltd. (Lincoln), over $2.1 million. Zurich then proceeded with an action against Puccini. Puccini filed for summary judgment arguing that it was an additional insured under the Zurich policy. The trial court agreed with Puccini and dismissed the action. Zurich then appealed the case to Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals. Finding that the lease contemplated both liability on the part of the tenant and indemnification in favor of the landlord, the court held that the tenant was not an implied co-insured under Zurich’s policy. Thus, the court allowed Zurich’s subrogation action. The Sutton Doctrine Extension of the Anti-Subrogation Rule In the United States, most states have adopted an anti-subrogation rule either by statute or through common law. Under an anti-subrogation rule, an insurer may not pursue its insured for monies paid to the insured. While some states limit their anti-subrogation rule to apply only to the named insured, other states have expanded the rule to include parties listed as additional insureds, and even, in some instances, implied insureds (those parties not specifically listed, but still considered an insured under the applicable policy). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rahul Gogineni, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Gogineni may be contacted at

    Court Addresses Damages Under Homeowners Insurance Policy

    January 21, 2019 —
    During a storm, a tree landed on a homeowners house causing damage to the home’s foundation. Homeowners filed a claim on their homeowners insurance policy to recover the resulting damages. After homeowners and insurance company could not come to an agreement on value of the loss, homeowners filed a lawsuit. Homeowners presented the testimony of a contractor as an expert witness regarding the damage and the resulting loss of value. Contractor testified that the home value was reduced in half as a direct result of the damage to the home’s foundation. Insurance company sought to exclude the contractor’s testimony, arguing he was not qualified as an expert and did not apply appropriate methodology to reach his opinions. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David R. Cook, Jr., Autry, Hall, & Cook, LLP
    Mr. Cook may be contacted at

    The Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – A Year in Review

    February 27, 2019 —
    Welcome to CICR’s annual review of insurance cases. Here, we spotlight five (actually, seven) decisions from the last year that you should know about, and five pending cases—all before state high courts—to keep an eye on. The choices were not always easy. That is because 2018 saw a number of notable insurance coverage developments. Among them was the “Restatement of the Law – Liability Insurance,” a nearly five hundred-page document that the American Law Institute (ALI) adopted after eight years and twenty-nine drafts. Already, much has been written about the ALI Restatement, including by us. There will be more to come. Going forward, we will continue to highlight significant examples where courts address its provisions. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Solicitor General’s Views to Supreme Court on Two Circuit Court Rulings that Groundwater Can be Considered “Waters of the United States”

    March 04, 2019 —
    On December 3, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court invited the Solicitor’s views on the contested issues whether discharges to groundwater are subject to an he National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and whether there is an “ongoing violation” of the Clean Water Act for Citizen Suit jurisdiction when the source of the pipeline spill has been fixed, yet not all pollutants have been cleaned up. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at

    Are You Taking Full Advantage of Available Reimbursements for Assisting Injured Workers?

    January 08, 2019 —
    Workplace injuries are an increasingly expensive cost of doing business. While every business does their best to avoid these injuries, even the most prepared employers must deal with them on occasion. The costs associated with these injuries—increased worker’s compensation premiums, decreased productivity, hiring temporary employees, and the loss of experienced workers—can be mitigated by shrewd employers taking full advantage of available assistance programs. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jonathan Schirmer, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Schirmer may be contacted at

    When Brad Pitt Tried to Save the Lower Ninth Ward

    February 18, 2019 —
    In the months that followed Hurricane Katrina in 2005, there was much ­discussion about how to rebuild the New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by flooding. Some even questioned whether certain areas should be rebuilt at all: The city’s population would likely be smaller; perhaps its footprint should be revised? The Lower Ninth Ward, for instance—a working-class black neighborhood ravaged when a floodwall failed—might be a lost cause, some said, because it was so severely damaged. Neighborhood residents and activists pushed back, insisting the Lower Nine deserved rebuilding. One of the most high-­profile efforts to do so came from an unlikely figure: Brad Pitt. In 2007 the actor founded the Make It Right Foundation, a nonprofit whose mission was to build affordable housing to help Lower Nine residents come home. Attracting designs from prize-­winning architects and committing to the highest energy-efficiency standards, Make It Right pledged to build 150 residences. As Pitt later wrote, the organization aimed to make “a human success story of how we can build in the future, how we can build with equality, how we can build for families." Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rob Walker, Bloomberg

    Be Careful with Continuous Breach and Statute of Limitations

    January 21, 2019 —
    If you are a construction attorney like me (or anyone that takes cases to court), you deal with statutes of limitation on a daily basis. These statutes seem pretty simple. A party has “X” amount of time in which to file its lawsuit after accural of the cause of action. In a breach of contract suit, the accrual is the date of breach. Easy, right? Wrong, at least in some circumstances. Take for example, the case of Fluor Fed. Sols., LLC v. PAE Applied Techs., LLC out of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. In this unpublished opinion the Court looked at “continuous breach” versus “series of separate breaches.” The basic facts are that in 2000 Flour entered into a contract with PAE whereby PAE requested and claims to have received consent from Flour to a 2.3% administrative cost cap on Flour’s work on an Air Force contract. Flour claimed that it did not agree to this cap. In 2002, Flour begain billing PAE for its costs plus the 2.3% administrative markup and billed in this fashion for the first full year. However, in subsequent years and for the next 11 years, Flour billed PAE at a higher markup rate than the 2.3%. PAE disputed the increased markup and paid Flour at the 2.3% rate. Flour periodically protested but made no move to court until it filed suit in March of 2016. After a bench trial, the district court found that Flour had agreed to the cap and found for PAE. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at

    60-Mile-Long Drone Inspection Flight Points to the Future

    January 15, 2019 —
    Black & Veatch announced in December the successful conclusion of a 60-mile-log, non-stop, proof-of-concept drone-based inspection flight conducted by a remote pilot in a command center miles away in rural Illinois. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tom Sawyer, ENR
    Mr. Sawyer may be contacted at