• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Palos Heights Illinois Medical building expert witness Palos Heights Illinois concrete tilt-up expert witness Palos Heights Illinois housing expert witness Palos Heights Illinois multi family housing expert witness Palos Heights Illinois condominium expert witness Palos Heights Illinois landscaping construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois structural steel construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois office building expert witness Palos Heights Illinois institutional building expert witness Palos Heights Illinois condominiums expert witness Palos Heights Illinois industrial building expert witness Palos Heights Illinois hospital construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois production housing expert witness Palos Heights Illinois custom home expert witness Palos Heights Illinois townhome construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois retail construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois parking structure expert witness Palos Heights Illinois low-income housing expert witness Palos Heights Illinois Subterranean parking expert witness Palos Heights Illinois casino resort expert witness Palos Heights Illinois mid-rise construction expert witness Palos Heights Illinois
    Palos Heights Illinois construction project management expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois architecture expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois building code expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois construction claims expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois architect expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois civil engineer expert witnessPalos Heights Illinois civil engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Palos Heights, Illinois

    Illinois Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB4873 Pending: The Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act provides that a construction professional shall be liable to a homeowner for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the professional and his or her agents, employees, or subcontractors. This bill requires the service of notice to the professional of the complained-of defect in the construction by the homeowner prior to commencement of a lawsuit. Allows the professional to make an offer of repair or settlement and to rescind this offer if the claimant fails to respond within 30 days.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Palos Heights Illinois

    No state license required for general contracting. License required for roofing.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    SouthWest Suburban Home Builders Association
    Local # 1432
    10767 W 163rd Pl
    Orland Park, IL 60467

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Northern Illinois Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1434
    3695 Darlene Ct Ste 102
    Aurora, IL 60504

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Fox Valley
    Local # 1431
    PO Box 1146
    Saint Charles, IL 60174

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago
    Local # 1425
    5999 S. New Wilke Rd Ste 104
    Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kankakee
    Local # 1445
    221 S Schuyler Ave Ste B
    Kankakee, IL 60901

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Greater Rockford Area
    Local # 1465
    631 N Longwood St Suite 102
    Rockford, IL 61107

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Peoria
    Local # 1455
    1599 N Main Street
    East Peoria, IL 61611

    Palos Heights Illinois Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Palos Heights Illinois

    SIGAR Report Finds +$15 Billion in “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” in Afghanistan

    Should CGL Insurer have Duty to Defend Insured During Chapter 558 Notice of Construction Defects Process???

    Steven L. Heisdorffer Joins Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell

    Construction Defect Litigation in Nevada Called "Out of Control"

    Can a Non-Signatory Invoke an Arbitration Provision?

    Are Construction Defect Laws Inhibiting the Development of Attached Ownership Housing in Colorado?

    How One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme Court

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Four Dead After Crane Collapses at Google’s Seattle Campus

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: World Class Shopping Experiences

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Improvements to Confederate Monuments Lead to Lawsuits

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says South Carolina High Court

    New Jersey Appeals Court Ruled Suits Stand Despite HOA Bypassing Bylaw

    Expert Medical Science Causation Testimony Improperly Excluded under Daubert; ID of Sole Cause of Medical Condition Not Required

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Washington Supreme Court Expands Contractor Notice Obligations

    Construction Defect Coverage Barred Under Business Risk Exclusion in Colorado

    Approaches to Managing Job Site Inventory

    New York’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court Ruling That Imposed Erroneous Timeliness Requirement For Disclaimers of Coverage

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    "Repair Work" Endorsements and Punch List Work

    EPA Announces that January 2017 Revised RMP Rules are Now Effective

    No Retrofit without Repurposing in Los Angeles

    Engineers Found ‘Hundreds’ of Cracks in California Bridge

    A Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway Fix

    California Supreme Court Protects California Policyholders for Intentional Acts of Employees

    Anatomy of an Indemnity Provision

    In a Win for Property Owners California Court Expands and Clarifies Privette Doctrine

    The Air in There: Offices, and Issues, That Seem to Make Us Stupid

    Be Careful How You Terminate: Terminating for Convenience May Limit Your Future Rights

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    Homeowners Should Beware, Warn Home Builders

    New York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New York

    Sobering Facts for Construction Safety Day

    Florida trigger

    Insurer's Judgment on the Pleadings Based Upon Expected Injury Exclusion Reversed

    NY Court Holds Excess Liability Coverage Could Never be Triggered Where Employers’ Liability Policy Provided Unlimited Insurance Coverage

    Three Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018

    Performing Work with a Suspended CSLB License Costs Big: Subcontractor Faces $18,000,000 Disgorgement

    U.K. Construction Growth Unexpectedly Accelerated in January

    Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is Not an "Occurrence"

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    How Machine Learning Can Help with Urban Development

    California Pipeline Disaster Brings More Scandal for PG&E

    Connecting IoT Data to BIM

    99-Year-Old Transmission Tower Seen as Possible Cause of Devastating Calif. Wildfire

    Failure to Comply with Sprinkler Endorsement Bars Coverage for Fire Damage
    Corporate Profile


    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Palos Heights, Illinois Expert Witness Engineer Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Palos Heights' most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Palos Heights, Illinois

    ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud

    April 02, 2019 —
    I have discussed the ConsensusDOCS here at Musings on a few occasions. These relatively new form documents, endorsed by the AGC among other trade organizations, are a great counterpoint to the AIA documents that we all are more than familiar with and as construction attorneys and contractors have likely reviewed on numerous occasions. Recently, these documents have joined the parade and have taken to the cloud. The folks at ConsensusDOCS made this move to ease the type of collaboration that I have discussed must occur on construction projects among the players. The use of the cloud based technology is one of the first uses of this technology to increase productivity. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at

    Know What’s Under Ground and Make Smarter Planning Decisions

    July 29, 2019 —
    A Finnish experimentation project developed a framework for classifying ground conditions for building and infrastructure construction. It will help anticipate the future cost of foundation laying during the early stages of city planning. The ground conditions of an area can have a substantial effect on the costs and the environmental impacts of constructing buildings and infrastructure. At early stage, urban designers don’t typically have enough data to make smart decisions about zoning in that respect as obtaining that data is time-consuming and hence also costly. Consequently, an experimentation project called MAKU-digi: Making the costs of land use visible devised a method for automating the analysis of ground conditions. I had the pleasure of interviewing Juha Liukas, Lead Advisor at Sitowise, and Hilkka Kallio, Geologist at Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), about the project. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at

    90 and 150: Two Numbers You Must Know

    July 22, 2019 —
    Mechanic’s liens are a big topic here at Construction Law Musings. I’ve discussed everything from the picky nature of this powerful payment tool to the changes that are upcoming on July 1, 2019. Given the strict way that the form and timing of a Virginia mechanic’s lien is so critical, I thought a quick reminder was in order. Two numbers that are critical to the timing and content of any mechanic’s lien are 90 and 150, both found in Va. Code 43-4. 90 days is the time from the last date of work (not invoicing), or last date of the last month in which work was done given proper circumstances. The 90 days prescibes the time during which a contractor can properly record a valid lien. This is a hard deadline and is 90 days, not three months. Miss this deadline and no matter what the type of payment that has not been made (something discussed below), the contractor will lose its lien rights. This is the easier of the two numbers to both understand and apply. Count 90 days from last non-corrective or warranty work and that is your hard out for filing. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at

    EPA Announces Decision to Retain Current Position on RCRA Regulation of Oil and Gas Production Wastes

    June 03, 2019 —
    After much study, EPA has decided against changing its current RCRA Subtitle D rules affecting the state regulation of oil and gas exploration & production waste. Since 1988, EPA has determined that most such wastes should be regulated as only non-hazardous wastes subject to RCRA Subtitle D, and not the more onerous hazardous waste provisions of RCRA Subtitle C. (See the Regulatory Determination of Oil and Gas and Geothermal Exploration, Development and Production Wastes, 53 FR 25,446 (July 6,1988).) As a result, under the Subtitle D rules, the primary regulators of such waste are state regulatory agencies, which follow the state plan non-hazardous waste guidelines developed by EPA. This regulatory disposition has proven to be fairly controversial, and it was recently challenged in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia: Environmental Integrity Project, et al. v. McCarthy. To settle this lawsuit, EPA and the plaintiffs entered into a consent decree by which EPA was to make certain determinations about the future of the program after conducting an appropriate study. That study, Management of Exploration, Development and Production Wastes: Factors Informing a Decision on the Need for Regulatory Action, has been completed, and it concludes, after a fairly comprehensive review of these state regulatory programs, that “revisions to the federal regulations for the management of E&P wastes under Subtitle D of RCRA (40 CFR Part 257) are not necessary at this time.” In a statement released on April 23, 2019, EPA accepted these findings and promised that it would continue to work with states and other stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and to address emerging issues to ensure that exploration, development and production wastes “continue to be managed in a manner that is protective of human health and the environment.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at

    Mich. AG Says Straits of Mackinac Tunnel Deal Unconstitutional

    June 03, 2019 —
    Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) has declared unconstitutional a late-2018 law that would create an authority to oversee construction of a key tunnel. The tunnel would house an oil-and-gas pipeline under the Straits of Mackinac. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, ENR
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    August 06, 2019 —
    Project closeout is sometimes one of the last things on a contractor’s mind at the beginning of a project, but project closeout can have a huge impact on a contractor’s overall profitability and success. Effectively managing the closeout process is critical, and it all begins with the negotiation and execution of the project contract. This contract can, and should, provide a complete roadmap for project closeout, as addressing these issues on the front end can set up the parties for successful project completion. It is then equally important to re-review the terms of the contract as project closeout approaches to ensure that everyone, including the owner, adheres to all contractual requirements. This article examines several pertinent issues related to project closeout that should be addressed during the contracting stage, including defining substantial and final completion, inspection and acceptance, punch lists, and warranties. Defining Substantial and Final Completion Having clear definitions for both substantial and final completion in your construction contract is an important and necessary early step in achieving successful project closeout. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William E. Underwood, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Underwood may be contacted at

    Overview of New Mexico Construction Law

    June 25, 2019 —
    We’ve seen an uptick in out-of-state companies working on construction projects in New Mexico. The following is an overview of some of the nuances of New Mexico construction law about which companies may want to be aware. Construction Contract Issues Limitation of Liability Clauses are usually Enforceable, but Anti-Indemnity Clauses Are Not New Mexico courts have enforced limitation of liability clauses included in construction contracts. See Fort Knox Self Storage, Inc. v. W. Techs., Inc., 140 N.M. 233, 237 (N.M. Ct. App 2006). New Mexico law recognizes the difference between contracts that insulate a party from any and all liability and those that simply limit liability. Fort Knox Self Storage, Inc., 140 N.M. 233 at 237. An exculpatory clause immunizes a party from liability, whereas a limitation of liability clause merely curtails liability. Id. A limitation of liability clause has been held not to violate New Mexico public policy because the party “still bears substantial responsibility for its actions.” Id.; see also Cowan v. D'Angelico, 2010 WL 11493789, *6 (D. N.M. Apr. 26, 2010). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Walker F. Crowson, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Crowson may be contacted at

    “If It Walks Like A Duck . . .” – Expert Testimony Not Always Required In Realtor Malpractice Cases Where Alleged Breach Of Duty Can Be Easily Understood By Lay Persons

    April 17, 2019 —
    In Ryan v. Real Estate of the Pacific, Inc., et al. (No. D072724, filed 2/26/19), the Fourth Appellate District reversed a trial court’s granting of summary judgment and finding that expert testimony is not required in a professional negligence action where the claimed acts or omissions are within the understanding of a lay person. Daniel and Patricia Ryan hired Defendants David Schroedl, David Schroedl & Associates, and Real Estate of the Pacific, Inc., doing business as Pacific Sotheby’s International Realty to list, market, and sell their property. During an open house, the Ryans’ neighbor informed Defendant David Schroedl that he planned significant construction on his own property which would impact the Ryans’ property including, but not limited to, building a large addition that would obstruct the property’s westerly ocean view. Schroedl never disclosed this information to the Ryans or to the subsequent purchasers of the Ryans’ property. The day after escrow closed, the new owners’ interior decorator spoke with that neighbor who again explained his extensive remodeling plans. Reprinted courtesy of David W. Evans, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Renata L. Hoddinott, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Mr. Evans may be contacted at Ms. Hoddinott may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of