• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Anvik Alaska multi family housing expert witness Anvik Alaska condominiums expert witness Anvik Alaska hospital construction expert witness Anvik Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Anvik Alaska Medical building expert witness Anvik Alaska low-income housing expert witness Anvik Alaska institutional building expert witness Anvik Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Anvik Alaska retail construction expert witness Anvik Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Anvik Alaska custom homes expert witness Anvik Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Anvik Alaska production housing expert witness Anvik Alaska parking structure expert witness Anvik Alaska condominium expert witness Anvik Alaska tract home expert witness Anvik Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Anvik Alaska office building expert witness Anvik Alaska industrial building expert witness Anvik Alaska housing expert witness Anvik Alaska townhome construction expert witness Anvik Alaska
    Anvik Alaska hospital construction expert witnessAnvik Alaska construction claims expert witnessAnvik Alaska civil engineering expert witnessAnvik Alaska structural concrete expertAnvik Alaska testifying construction expert witnessAnvik Alaska reconstruction expert witnessAnvik Alaska construction expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Anvik, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anvik Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required

    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Anvik Alaska Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Anvik Alaska

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Denial of Coverage Unsuccessful

    Coverage Found For Cleanup of Superfund Site Despite Pollution Exclusion

    General Contractors: Consider Importance of "Primary Noncontributory" Language

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Proposed Florida Construction Defect Act

    No Coverage Based Upon Your Prior Work Exclusion

    Building Growth Raises Safety Concerns

    Rihanna Gained an Edge in Construction Defect Case

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    New Jersey Rules that Forensic Lab Analysts Can’t be Forced to Testify

    Wow! A Mechanic’s Lien Bill That Helps Subcontractors and Suppliers

    Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos Exposure

    Architect Sues over Bidding Procedure

    Ben L. Aderholt Joins Coats Rose Construction Litigation Group

    Let it Shine: California Mandates Rooftop Solar for New Residential Construction

    California Senator Proposes Bill to Require Contractors to Report Construction Defect Cases

    Submitting Claims on Government Projects Can Be Tricky

    Builders Beware: Smart Homes Under Attack by “Hide ‘N Seek” Botnet

    Wall Failure Due to Construction Defect Says Insurer

    Strategy for Enforcement of Dispute Resolution Rights

    ICC/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Green Model Code Integrates Existing Standards

    Elizabeth Lofts Condo Owners Settle with Plumbing Supplier

    How Long is Your Construction Warranty?

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    Tokyo Building Flaws May Open Pandora's Box for Asahi Kasei

    Sold Signs Fill Builder Lots as U.S. Confidence Rises: Economy

    Hake Law Attorneys Join National Law Firm Wilson Elser

    Hawaii Court Looks at Changes to Construction Defect Coverage after Changes in Law

    Construction Venture Sues LAX for Nonpayment

    Used French Fry Oil Fuels London Offices as Buildings Go Green

    Texas Public Procurements: What Changed on September 1, 2017? a/k/a: When is the Use of E-Verify Required?

    Janus v. AFSCME

    Teaching An Old Dog New Tricks: The Spearin Doctrine and Design-Build Projects

    Insurer’s “Failure to Cooperate” Defense

    High Attendance Predicted for West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Contractor Walks Off Job. What are the Owner’s Damages?

    Revel Closing Shows Gambling Is No Sure Thing for Renewal

    New California Standards Go into Effect July 1st

    Luxury Villa Fraudsters Jailed for Madeira Potato Field Scam

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence

    Appeals Court Rules that CGL Policy Doesn’t Cover Subcontractors’ Faulty Work

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    WA Supreme Court Allows Property Owner to Sue Engineering Firm for Lost Profits

    Depreciation of Labor in Calculating Actual Cash Value Against Public Policy

    Risk Management for Condominium Conversions

    Virginia Tech Has Its Own Construction Boom

    Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida Law

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    #11 CDJ Topic: Cortez Blu Community Association, Inc. v. K. Hovnanian at Cortez Hill, LLC, et al.

    No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Causing Property Damage to Insured's Product Only
    Corporate Profile


    The Anvik, Alaska Expert Witness Engineer Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Anvik, Alaska

    Carillion Fallout Affects Major Hospital Project in Liverpool

    October 30, 2018 —
    Managers of a 90%-complete, 646-bed hospital in Liverpool will take charge of the project after unravelling a public-private partnership with the contractor Carillion Plc, which collapsed ignominiously in January (ENR 1/22 p. 12). Following cancellation of the contractor’s other large U.K. hospital P3, near Birmingham, project lenders face large losses. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Peter Reina, ENR
    Mr. Reina may be contacted at

    An Expert’s Qualifications are Important

    January 28, 2019 —
    An expert’s qualifications are important. Please remember this the next time you retain an expert to analyze documents or data and render an opinion based on that information. An expert must be qualified to render an opinion. Otherwise the expert will not be allowed to render the opinion you may be looking for or need for purposes of trial, as discussed below. A recent personal injury case, White v. Ring Power Corp., 43 Fla.L.Weekly D2729a (Fla. 3d 2018), involved a crane operator that became severely injured when operating a leased crane. The case proceeded to trial against only the equipment lessor of the crane based on the plaintiff’s contention that there were deficiencies with the crane. The plaintiff intended on using expert witnesses to interpret the crane’s load movement indicator (referred to as LMI) and render opinions that the LMI data showed prior overloads of the crane which resulted in the injury to the operator of the crane. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    9th Circuit Closes the Door on “Open Shop” Contractor

    September 04, 2018 —
    At the height of the Great Depression nearly one-quarter of Americans were unemployed. In response, Congress enacted a series of laws including the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs Act, which raised tariffs on foreign goods in an effort to spur domestic investment and to increase the number of jobs. Sound familiar? Background The Davis-Bacon Act Among the new laws enacted by Congress was the Davis-Bacon Act which required contractors on federal works projects to pay their workers the wages prevailing in the area where a project was located, also known as “prevailing wages,” in an effort to stem the practice of employers bringing in lower-wage workers from outside the area. The same year that the Davis-Bacon Act was enacted, California enacted its own prevailing wage law modeled after the Davis-Bacon Act and applicable to state and local public works projects. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    Newmeyer & Dillion Named a Best Law Firm in 2019 in Multiple Practice Areas by U.S. News-Best Lawyers

    November 21, 2018 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – NOVEMBER 1, 2018 – Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer & Dillion LLP is pleased to announce that U.S. News-Best Lawyers® has recognized the firm in its 2019 "Best Law Firms" rankings, with six of its practice areas earning the highest ranking possible - Tier 1 in the Orange County Metro area. The practices recognized include Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Insurance Law, Litigation - Construction, Litigation - Real Estate and Real Estate Law. Firms included in the 2019 "Best Law Firms" list have been recognized by their clients and peers for their professional excellence. Firms achieving a Tier 1 ranking have consistently demonstrated a unique combination of quality law practice and breadth of legal expertise. "We are honored that our clients and peers continue to recognize the firm's exceptional attorneys and the firm's commitment to delivering personalized service and achieving the best results possible to those we represent," said Managing Partner Jeff Dennis. To be eligible for the "Best Law Firms" ranking, a firm must have at least one attorney recognized in the current edition of The Best Lawyers in America for a specific practice area. Best Lawyers recognizes the top 4 percent of practicing attorneys in the U.S., selected through exhaustive peer-review surveys in which leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. About Newmeyer & Dillion For almost 35 years, Newmeyer & Dillion has delivered creative and outstanding legal solutions and trial results for a wide array of clients. With over 70 attorneys practicing in all aspects of corporate, privacy & data security, employment, real estate, construction, insurance law and trial work, Newmeyer & Dillion delivers legal services tailored to meet each client's needs. Headquartered in Newport Beach, California, with offices in Walnut Creek, California and Las Vegas, Nevada, Newmeyer & Dillion attorneys are recognized by The Best Lawyers in America©, and Super Lawyers as top tier and some of the best lawyers in California, and have been given Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review's AV Preeminent® highest rating. For additional information, call 949.854.7000 or visit Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Japan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant Offline

    September 10, 2018 —
    A magnitude 6.7 earthquake occurred on the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido on Sept. 6, leaving at least seven dead and damaging buildings and structures in the region, including a 1,650MW coal-fired thermal power plant that was taken offline. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Rubenstone, ENR
    Mr. Rubenstone may be contacted at

    Liquidated Damages: A Dangerous Afterthought

    January 15, 2019 —
    Owners and contractors frequently treat liquidated damages provisions as an afterthought, but they deserve to be treated as a key deal term. If a contractor breaches a contract by failing to complete the work in a timely manner, the remedy is typically an agreed upon amount or rate of liquidated damages. Liquidated damages provisions seldom get more than a cursory, “back of the napkin” analysis, or worse, parties will simply plug in a number. This practice is dangerous because liquidated damages typically represent the owner’s sole remedy for delay and, more importantly, they are subject to attack and possible invalidation if certain legal standards are not met. The parties to a construction contract should never agree to an amount of liquidated damages without first attempting to forecast and calculate actual, potential damages. Reprinted courtesy of Trevor B. Potter, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    The Hidden Price of Outdated Damage Prevention Laws: Part I

    November 21, 2018 —
    Excavators know that dialing 811 triggers a process that requires all utilities operating in the service area to find and mark the location of their underground facilities so that they are not damaged during the excavation process. In addition, marking the location of the utilities is intended to keep the public safe, for instance by preventing an excavator from striking a gas line. But excavators also know that in most states, the laws and regulations that govern these procedures are weak and that enforcement is even weaker. It’s an unfortunate fact that excavators and the public – typically the least culpable parties – suffer the consequences of weak damage prevention laws and lack of strong enforcement regimes. Reprinted courtesy of Brigham A. McCown, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    EPA Announces that January 2017 Revised RMP Rules are Now Effective

    February 06, 2019 —
    On December 3, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Federal Register notice advising the regulated community that EPA’s controversial Clean Air Act (CAA) stationary source Risk Management Program (RMP) rules are effective as of December 3, 2018 – the Final Rule: Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act (83 FR 62268). The initial package of the RMP rules was promulgated in 1996, but a series of chemical explosions prompted the development of new rules, whose process safety, third party auditing, emergency response, preparedness and information sharing provisions were designed to confront these challenges. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at