BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Fairfield Connecticut casino resort expert witness Fairfield Connecticut mid-rise construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut Medical building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut industrial building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut multi family housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut Subterranean parking expert witness Fairfield Connecticut production housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut concrete tilt-up expert witness Fairfield Connecticut parking structure expert witness Fairfield Connecticut office building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut tract home expert witness Fairfield Connecticut townhome construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut institutional building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut structural steel construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut condominium expert witness Fairfield Connecticut retail construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut landscaping construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut hospital construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut condominiums expert witness Fairfield Connecticut high-rise construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut
    Fairfield Connecticut engineering consultantFairfield Connecticut construction cost estimating expert witnessFairfield Connecticut construction expert testimonyFairfield Connecticut architect expert witnessFairfield Connecticut engineering expert witnessFairfield Connecticut ada design expert witnessFairfield Connecticut architecture expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairfield Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fairfield Connecticut


    Additional Dismissals of COVID Business Interruption, Civil Authority Claims

    Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase

    Lost Productivity or Inefficiency Claim Can Be Challenging to Prove

    Understanding the Miller Act

    2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Narrow House Has Wide Opposition

    Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.

    Why Is California Rebuilding in Fire Country? Because You’re Paying for It

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    An Increase of US Metro Areas’ with Normal Housing & Economic Health

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    Fraudster Sells 24-Bedroom ‘King’s Speech’ London Mansion

    Additional Insured Secures Defense Under Subcontractor's Policy

    A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t Mix

    Safety Accusations Fly in Dispute Between New York Developer and Contractor

    Spotting Problem Projects

    Damron Agreement Questioned in Colorado Casualty Insurance v Safety Control Company, et al.

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Blackouts Require a New Look at Backup Power

    The Moving Finish Line: Statutes of Limitation and Repose Are Not Always What They Seem

    OSHA Issues Fines for Fatal Building Collapse in Philadelphia

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    US Appeals Court Halts OSHA Vaccine Mandate, Unclear How Long

    Fourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    The Insurance Coverage Debate on Construction Defects Continues

    The Goldilocks Rule: Panel Rejects Proposed Insurer-Specific MDL Proceedings for Four Large Insurers, but Establishes MDL Proceeding for the Smallest

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Motion for Remand

    What You Need to Know About Notices of Completion, Cessation and Non-Responsibility

    Atlanta Office Wins Defense Verdict For Property Manager On Claims By Vendor, Cross-Claims By Property Owner

    Was Jury Right in Negligent Construction Case?

    Federal Court Dismisses Coverage Action in Favor of Pending State Proceeding

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams Lawyers

    Court Holds That Parent Corporation Lacks Standing to Sue Subsidiary’s Insurers for Declaratory Relief

    Florida Federal Court Reinforces Principle That Precise Policy Language Is Required Before An Insurer Can Deny Coverage Based On An Exclusion

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    New Utah & Colorado Homebuilder Announced: Jack Fisher Homes

    Address 'Your Work' Exposure Within CPrL Policies With Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    CAUTION: Terms of CCP Section 998 Offers to Compromise Must Be Fully Contained in the Offer Itself

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Burks Smith and Katie Keller Win Daubert Motion Excluding Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony in the Middle District of Florida

    Can Your Employee File a Personal Injury Claim if They’re Injured at Work?

    Sometimes, Being too Cute with Pleading Allegations is Unnecessary

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Utah for Damage Caused By Faulty Workmanship

    Potential Construction Liabilities Contractors Need to Know

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    New Survey Reveals Present-Day Risks of Asbestos Exposure in America - 38% in High-Risk Jobs, 47% Vulnerable through Second-Hand Exposure

    Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams Meetings

    Remote Work Issues to Consider in Light of COVID-19

    Oklahoma Finds Policy Can Be Assigned Post-Loss
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRFIELD CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Fairfield, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Fairfield's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    New WOTUS Rule

    November 13, 2023 —
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers amended the regulation to conform the definition of “waters of the United States” to conform to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. See the prior blog post about the Supreme Court’s ruling: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency – Construction and Utility Law | Atlanta | AHC Law Federal Register :: Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”; Conforming Reprinted courtesy of David R. Cook Jr., Autry, Hall & Cook, LLP Mr. Cook may be contacted at cook@ahclaw.com Read the full story...

    Risky Business: Contractual Versus Equitable Rights of Subrogation

    December 16, 2023 —
    In Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Infrastructure Eng’g. Inc., 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 383, the insurer, Zurich American Insurance Company (Insurer) proceeded as subrogee of Community College District No. 508 d/b/a City Colleges of Chicago and CMO, a Joint Venture. The Appellate Court of Illinois, First District (Appellate Court) addressed whether Insurer – who issued a builder’s risk policy to insure a building during construction – could subrogate on behalf of the building owner, City Colleges of Chicago (City Colleges), who was part of the joint venture and an additional named insured, but who had not been directly paid for the underlying loss. The Appellate Court determined that the policy language established that the carrier was contractually permitted to subrogate on behalf of all additional named insureds on the policy, including the building owner. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle Rice, White and Williams
    Mr. Rice may be contacted at ricek@whiteandwilliams.com

    SCOTUS to Weigh Landowners' Damage Claim Against Texas DOT

    November 13, 2023 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case this term that could affect whether states must pay compensation to landowners whose property was damaged by public project execution. Payments also could extend to state owned utilities and others. Reprinted courtesy of Mary B. Powers, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Construction Contract Basics: Attorney Fee Provisions

    November 13, 2023 —
    I have discussed the need for attorney fee provisions in your construction contracts in prior posts here at Construction Law Musings, but thought it merited a restatement of the reasons for the inclusion of such fee provisions (and changing of such provisions when presented) here with the second of my construction contract basics posts. Why would you want such a provision? The answer is that without it, or a statute specifically allowing for such fees, a Virginia court will not award your attorney fees without such a provision. Virginia, and a lot of other states, follow the so-called “American Rule” when it comes to attorney fees and costs. In short, that rule states that the parties to litigation pay their own way unless they agree otherwise. While it may seem unfair to make a successful litigant pay for the privilege of being right, that is the rule in Virginia. Throw in the fact that Virginia courts strictly construe construction contracts and voila we have a situation where without a provision in the contract stating that one party or both will be able to collect attorney fees should that contractor or subcontractor prevail, a construction professional that gets sued (whether rightly or wrongly) will be left with a hefty attorney fees bill and no way to recoup those fees through the courts or any other method. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Payne & Fears LLP Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2024 “Best Law Firms” Rankings

    November 27, 2023 —
    Payne & Fears LLP has been recognized by Best Lawyers 2024 “Best Law Firms” list. Firms included in the 2024 edition of Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” are recognized for professional excellence with consistently impressive ratings from clients and peers. Payne & Fears LLP has been ranked in the following practice areas:
    • Metropolitan Tier 1
      • Orange County
        • Commercial Litigation
        • Employment Law – Management
        • Insurance Law
        • Labor Law – Management
        • Litigation – Labor & Employment
        • Litigation – Real Estate
    • Metropolitan Tier 2
      • Las Vegas
        • Commercial Litigation
    • Metropolitan Tier 3
      • Orange County
        • Litigation – Intellectual Property
    Read the full story...

    Your Construction Contract

    April 08, 2024 —
    Your construction contract is an important topic. What’s even more important is YOUR process for reviewing and negotiating construction contracts. Are you simply acting as a riverboat gambler willing to assume undue risk because you don’t value the investment in understanding what you are signing? If so, it becomes hard to complain about what you agreed to and signed when you chose NOT to invest in the process. Investing in the process means you are working with a construction attorney, you have an insurance broker that understands your industry, you have resources in place to ensure risk is negotiated and allocated, and you understand what risk you are assuming to make sure you are properly protecting and perfecting your rights, and transferring risk downstream. When it comes to construction contracts, there are really three approaches: 1. Riverboat Gambler. This is the “I’ll sign whatever you give me because I don’t want to lose the contract / revenue.” Under this approach, you are not worried about undue risk because you don’t value the investment in the next two approaches. Your thought process is that you’ll care about the risk when an issue pops up, i.e., the riverboat gambler. This is not an approach I’d recommend because it is contrary to the adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” This is simply a reactive approach to issues and risks. The other two approaches are more proactive and better suited to understand and manage risk. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    December 16, 2023 —
    Illinois joins the majority of states finding “property damage that results inadvertently from faulty work can be caused by an ‘accident’ and therefore constitute an ‘occurrence’.” The Illinois Supreme Court’s ruling in Acuity v. M/I Homes of Chicago, LLC1 (“Acuity v. M/I Homes”) is the first high court ruling in Illinois on this critical coverage issue for contractors. M/I Homes of Chicago, LLC (“M/I Homes”) constructed a townhome development. After completion, water entered the townhomes resulting in interior water damage. The townhome owners’ association filed suit against M/I Homes alleging it, or its subcontractors, caused the damage because it used defective materials, conducted faulty workmanship, and failed to comply with applicable building codes (the “Underlying Action”). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/21/24) – Fed Chair Predicts More Small Bank Closures, Shopping Center Vacancies Hit 15-year Low, and Proptech Sees Mixed Results

    March 19, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, office occupancy rates hit all-time lows, global hotel investment to exceed numbers from 2023, federal courts look into real estate commissions, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team